Advertisement
Call the Show 800-520-1234
LIVE: Mon-Fri, 6-9AM, ET
Hugh Hewitt Book Club
Call 800-520-1234 email Email Hugh
Hugh Hewitt Book Club

Preventing Nuclear Terror

Email Email Print
Advertisement

The New York Times explores the cost versus the effectiveness of new detection technologies in the effort to prevent a nuclear device or a dirty bomb from getting to the core of a population center.

The cost estimates are necessarily vague, but the conversation about the appropriate appropriation ought to begin, I think, with what we have been willing to spend to prevent much less significant risks, and what others are willing to spend to prevent other theoretical harms, such as those associated with global warming. 

If, for example, the likelihood of nuclear terrorism over the course of the next 50 years is rated higher than that of the worst consequences of global warming occurring, then there ought to be some correlation between the amount urged for expenditure on the former versus that urged for expenditure on the latter.  Global warming alarmists may counter that their worst case scenarios involve costs far in excess of those associated with one or even a few nuclear incidents, and that argument may be valid.

But it hasn’t been made.  I suspect that it cannot be made as that would oblige enthusiasts of climate doom to be specific as to the costs they project and their assessment of risk in another field equally compelling in its potential devastation.

Hughniverse

Listen Commerical FREE  |  On-Demand
Login Join
Advertisement
Advertise with us Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Book Hugh Hewitt as a speaker for your meeting

Follow Hugh Hewitt

The Hugh Hewitt Show - Mobile App

Download from App Store Get it on Google play
Advertisement
Friends and Allies of Rome