Heaven is for Real - In Theaters Now

The Hugh Hewitt Show

Listen 24/7 Live: Mon - Fri   6 - 9 PM Eastern
Call the Show 800-520-1234

Texas Bound With Eric Metaxas; The Daily Caller’s Jamie Weinstein Sitting In

Thursday, April 10, 2014  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

I am in Fort Worth tonight for “Socrates in the City” with its host Eric Metaxas. talking about The Happiest Life.  The Daily Caller’s Jamie Weinstein, fresh from his first solo hosting two weeks ago, hosts from D.C. tonight.  Give a listen.

he Hoover Institution’s Lanhee Chen, who was in studio for an hour yesterday –transcript to follow at the Transcripts page– is the latest to say “that looks like fun,” so look for Mitt Romney’s former senior policy advisor to show up behind the mic someday soon.

AdvertisementAdvertise With Us

Fox’s O’Reilly and Politico’s Byers on MSM Bias Against Bill’s Books

Thursday, April 10, 2014  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

Bill O’Reilly dropped by the show last night to plug his new “The Last Days of Jesus.”  I asked him about the perennial (and accurate) complaint that MSM ignores the best-selling books of the center-right.  His response, and the response of Politico’s media reporter Dylan Byers, is below.  Not surprisingly, for Byers is fair, Byers concedes the double standard and the bias.  It has operated most obviously against O’Reilly’s books and especially against Mark Levin’s The Liberty Amendments, which is the most serious and large-selling  book of political theory by a conservative in many years.  As Byers notes, Rachel Maddow’s forgettable and poorly researched and written anti-war book got massive coverage.  Levin’s…not so much.

O’Reilly’s musings on what he would ask Pope Francis are also worth reviewing in the transcript.

O’Reilly audio:

Byers’ audio:

O’Reilly transcript:

Byers’ transcript:

The Defense Crisis

Wednesday, April 9, 2014  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

The Wall Street Journal today opines on “Putin Invades, Obama Dismantles,” and it is afire follow up to my conversation yesterday with the Journal’s Bret Stephens about Putin’s aggression and the just leaked plans for the next round of cuts to our nuclear arsenal:

Defense officials privately had said that they expected the cuts to spare U.S. submarine-launched weapons, which are considered the most survivable leg of the nuclear triad—which consists of bombers, subs and land-based missiles—and therefore the strongest deterrent force.

But the Pentagon instead decided to cut the number of submarine missile launch tubes from 336 today to 240 by 2018, a 29% reduction. It will cut the number of nuclear bombers from 96 B-52 and B-2s today to 66 by 2018, a 38% cut.

The Congressional GOP is belatedly taking notice and trying to get their Democratic colleagues to recognize that 2014 is not 1991 and that Russia and the PRC are aggressive, authoritarian powers that require a robust U.S. military and especially a fully functioning nuclear deterrent, not an ideology driven parity-by-leftwing-politics arsenal.

Paul Ryan has a piece out on the defense side of his budget, and the Washington Examiner’s David Drucker reports on the turn towards sharply higher defense spending.  The bad news is that Dick Durbin is the Senate’s leader on defense appropriations and he is solidly in the Obama appeasement camp.  Until the Senate is back in GOP hands, Putin, the PRC, Iran and the rest of the world’s aggressive authoritarians won’t have to worry that the U.S. is serious about rebuilding its nuclear deterrent, much less its Navy and Marine Corps or restoring too-deep Army cuts.  Bret Stephens spelled it out Monday: It is “Putin’s Moment.”

What Reince Said

Wednesday, April 9, 2014  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

Tuesday’s interview with Reince Priebus generated the usual hand wringing on the left when campaign contribution limits come up.  (The transcript of the interview is here.)

The last vestige of the ill-fated post-Watergate attempt to control money in politics should fall like the dead tree it is sometime in the next few years, and Priebus was just pointing out that contribution limits distort politics but don’t keep money out of it.  I also like to point out to folks that it was Barack Obama who dealt the death blow to public financing of campaigns with his 2008 presidential campaign decision to reject spending limits.  ”Do as we say, not as our leader did” is the argument of the left, but the First Amendment is clear and the 40 year frolic and detour from its clear admonition should be overturned and buried.

The reprisal issues Priebus rightly brought up –and they extend far beyond the Mozilla case– will fade away if people can give to candidates and parties and then expect them to act as principled individuals or coherent entities.  Far from corrupting government, getting back to direct funding of candidates and parties as opposed to cause funding and independent expenditures will greatly assist the healthy functioning of the Republic.

By the way, unions have an equal right to contribute to candidates and parties, just not the right to lift their members money without their members’ permission –another issue that awaits the Court’s remedy.

Page 5 of 3154 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 3,154
Terms of Engagement Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Invite Hugh to Speak
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top