The Hugh Hewitt Show

Listen 24/7 Live: Mon - Fri   6 - 9 AM Eastern
Call the Show 800-520-1234

Senator Lamar Alexander on the White House War On Fox and Anita Dunn’s Mickey Maoism

Thursday, October 22, 2009  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

I interviewed Tennessee’s Senator Lamar Alexnader yesterday, and the transcript is here. One excerpt:

HH: Let’s talk specifically about the Fox News anger over there [at the White House]. Anita Dunn, you know, she’s the communications director. She made this speech that referenced Mao and Mother Theresa. Glenn Beck has played it. He’s making a big deal about it. It’s a legitimate news story. Are we supposed to not report on, Senator Alexander, interesting aspects and political philosophies of senior White House aides?

LA: Well, you’re supposed to do that, and of course, the Nixon…you know, Republicans don’t like a lot that’s in the New York Times. And sometimes, they don’t like what’s in other newspapers. And sometimes, they complain about it. And in the Nixon administration, they started out just complaining, and they ended up with an enemies list. And it destroyed the presidency. So you’ve got to step back from that, put it into perspective, and focus on the…particularly with the presidency. I mean, the presidency itself should restrict itself to the most important issues. And calling people out who disagree with you doesn’t sound presidential to me.


“The ‘Smart Choices’ The Government Wants To Make For You.”

Wednesday, October 21, 2009  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

My new column is up on the FDA’s new program to control every food package in America.

Did I mention that it will empower trial lawyers?

Richard Dawkins and the Transparency of Insecurity (Bumped)

Tuesday, October 20, 2009  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

I taped an interview with Richard Dawkins Monday, which will air in the third hour of Tuesday’s show. As I note at the outset of our conversation, I took a course in natural selection theory as an undergrad from Stephen Jay Gould more than 30 years ago, and the key text was Dawkins’ The Selfish Gene, which I thought then and continue to believe is a fascinating book that deserves a close read from anyone interested in the theory of how organisms survive and thrive in the world.

The angry atheist Dawkins is far less interesting to me than the biologist Dawkins, and his unwillingness to debate folks like Dinesh D’Souza is an indictment of his confidence in his atheism –a projection really of the anti-intellectualism he attributes to his critics. Dawkins’ latest, The Greatest Show on Earth –the Evidence for Evolution is very interesting on many levels, but also full of unusual editorial choices, a sort of extended filibuster mixed with the sort of invective that is never very persuasive and almost always the mark of intellectual insecurity.

The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution

I look forward to your reactions to the conversation, and will open a thread at the Hughniverse to collect them. The books I reference in the interview are: David Berlinski’s The Devil’s Delusion,

The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions

Francis Collins’ The Language of God,

The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief

and Mark D. Roberts’ Can We Trust The Gospels?

Can We Trust the Gospels?: Investigating the Reliability of Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John

In our exchanges, Dawkins evades direct questions a few times, and seems unable to grasp even the most obvious of objections which is that the analogies he employs to explainhis methods and to attack his critics ought also to be applicable to challenge his own arguments. When I did so, he exclaimed that I sounded like a lawyer, which of course I am, and which I admit does leave me bound up by the conventions of proof that go along with the study of law.

The transcript of our conversation will be posted here after the show airs.

Page 1238 of 3571 1 1,235 1,236 1,237 1,238 1,239 1,240 1,241 3,571
Advertise With UsAdvertisement
Sierra Pacific Mortgage Advertisement
Back to Top