View the trailer

The Hugh Hewitt Show

Listen 24/7 Live: Mon - Fri   6 - 9 AM Eastern
Call the Show 800-520-1234
European Voyage Cruise 2017 Advertisement

“A Massachusetts Miracle?” and the Globe’s Agenda Journalism and Pseudo-Polling

Sunday, January 10, 2010  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

My new Washington Examiner column looks at the the Brown surge in Massachusetts.

It is based on many bits of evidence, from Rasmussen’s poll from last week showing a 9 point Coakley lead to the Saturday shocker from Public Policy Polling showing a one point Brown lead.

Today, though, the Boston Globe publishes a story with the headline “Senate poll: Coakley up 15 points.”

The story does not reference the other polls, even though they both cast doubt on the credibility of the Globe’s poll’s results, thus making the story a double assault on the reader: The “poll” puts out obviously controversial findings while failing to print other findings that contradict the controversial “information.”

I don’t think Brown is ahead in this race, but I don’t think anyone in the Globe –anyone– believes Coakley is ahead by anything like 15 points. Publishing this poll with that headline is simple agenda journalism, a transparent bit of media malpractice that will influence the race by driving down the enthusiasm of Brown’s troops and introducing indifference among an electorate that might otherwise sense an opportunity to participate in a major upset. Momentum matters in politics, and a poll showing a 15 point deficit is a huge buzz killer.

The Globe no doubt has the poll in its hands, and an explanation of why it is so completely at odds with everything else known –and felt– about the race. But still it publishes it, and with that headline, on the cusp of absentee voting and just as the race crescendos. If a doctor made an equivalent decision based on equivalent inputs, he’d lose his license. A lawyer would be disbarred. But the media laughs and winks and moves on, even as the circulation slips into oblivion and advertising revenues collapse. Why buy a product you cannot trust to make even elementary decisions about stories that impact its credibility?

Lefty-but-fair FiveThirtyEight blog summarizes what it makes of all the data by concluding that
“I acknowledge that there is a fairly tangible shot of Brown winning — higher than the 3-5 percent I assigned to him after seeing the Rasmussen poll, but lower than the 15-25 percent chance I gave him before seeing the Boston Globe result.” In other words, a fair minded lefty saw a pretty decent shot of Brown winning before the Globe data arrived, which demonstrates the point about the impact of the Globe data. Outlier that it is, it still has an impact, which is why the Globe ought not to have run the story it did.

There’s nothing that can be done about lefty papers publishing lefty candidate-favoring polls. It is just a feature of the wildly left-wing MSM. When an objective obituary of the American newspaper is written, however, there will be space given over to the absurdity of the MSM’s political “polling,” and the impact on credibility/circulation/profits of such transparently biased interventions in the election cycle.

One more reason to vote for Brown: Embarassing the Globe. Though that appears to be impossible.


Another Key Reason For Voting For Massachusetts Voters To Vote For Scott Brown

Sunday, January 10, 2010  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

Scott Brown provides Massachusetts voters with another compelling contrast between his views and those of Martha Coakley: Brown opposes granting terrorists the same rights as Americans accused of crimes:


Help Brown put this message before Massachusetts voters with a contribution via his website.

“Apple’s one-device-to-rule-them-all iPad”

Sunday, January 10, 2010  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

It is coming. And as the writer points out, the iPad may help save journalism.

My Kindle already carries subscriptions from the Times of London, The New York Times, The Washington Post, the Wall Street Journal and If all of those become even easier to read via the iPad, the iPad will win. if the price point drops just a bit, even people whose jobs don’t require them to read that many papers will subscribe.

(Note to the Kindle team at Why doesn’t the Times of London download at 5 PM Pacific, the same time that the paper changes over on the web? Why don’t the other papers become available at 9 PM Pacific? Why isn’t the Cleveland Plan Dealer’s sport page available for subscription –and just the sports section? If it and the sports section of many other big city papers were available, thousands of ex-pats from those cities now living elsewhere would sign up for their morning fix of home town sports news.)

A Massachusetts Miracle?

Saturday, January 9, 2010  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

In the latest poll in the Bay State, Republican Scott Brown leads by one point in the special election.

The admission by appointed Senator Paul Kirk that he will vote for Obamacare regardless of what voters think, and the signs that dirty tricks will be used to subvert the will of the Massachusetts electorate to stop Obamacare should Brown pull this off illustrates the Obama approach to representative government.

The best thing to dois contribute to Brown’s campaign via his website this weekend to keep him competitive in the last eight days of the race.

Advertise With UsAdvertisement
Sierra Pacific Mortgage
Back to Top