Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 3:31 AM

That's the headline on this morning's Washington Post story about another old Roberts' memo from his White House days. Proclaiming that "[t]he words of the Supreme Court nominee, contained in a 1985 memo in which he approved a telegram from Reagan supporting the service, provide the clearest insight to date into Roberts's personal views on abortion at a time when both proponents and opponents of Roe have a keen interest in whether he would tip the court's balance on one of the nation's most volatile social issues," the Post rushes news of this memo to page 1.


Earlier this year Hillary Clinton proclaimed that "[w]e can all recognize that abortion in many ways represents a sad, even tragic choice to many, many women. The fact is that the best way to reduce the number of abortions is to reduce the number of unwanted pregnancies in the first place." Andrew Sullivan concurred with the senator's premise that "abortion is always and everywhere a moral tragedy." I assume, then, that the junior senator from New York and the blogger will both be endorsing Judge Roberts' assessment in this instance?


There are 5,393 documents in the latest dump from the Roberts' years in the White House Counsel's Office. How many more breathless leded will they inspire? Dana Milbank gets the ball rolling with this piece on young Justice-to-be Roberts' views on Michael Jackson.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 2:32 AM

While still in Europe I pointed you to Dean Barnett's "The New Litmus Test," which details the enormous stresses that the rise of the hard left has created within the Democrtaic Party.

Now over at "Call for a Summer of Truth," contributor RaginBlue6 gives voice to the left's disdain for their Washington leadership:

The prominence of party leaders like Biden and Clinton, and of a slew of other potential pro-war candidates who support the US invasion and occupation of Iraq, presents the Democrats with an odd dilemma: At a time when the American people are turning against the Iraq War and favor a withdrawal of US troops, and British and American leaders are publicly discussing a partial pullback, the leading Democratic presidential candidates for '08 are unapologetic war hawks. Nearly 60 percent of Americans now oppose the war, according to recent polling. Sixty-three percent want US troops brought home within the next year. Yet a recent National Journal "insiders poll" found that a similar margin of Democratic members of Congress reject setting any timetable. The possibility that America's military presence in Iraq may be doing more harm than good is considered beyond the pale of "sophisticated" debate.

The continued high standing of the hawks has been made possible by their enablers in the strategic class--the foreign policy advisers, think-tank specialists and pundits. Their presumed expertise gives the strategic class a unique license to speak for the party on national security issues. This group has always been quietly influential, but since 9/11 it has risen in prominence, egging on and underpinning elected officials, crowding out dissenters within its own ranks and becoming increasingly ideologically monolithic. So far its members remain unchallenged. It's more than a little ironic that the people who got Iraq so wrong continue to tell the Democrats how to get it right.


The acceleration of the party's base towards the left is gaining speed, even though a lot more pundits on the right than on the left are noticing it.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 2:20 AM

Online advertising is surging. (HT: Glenn).


Wait until the ad buyers figure out that the most powerful combination in the world is a radio buy sending listeners to easy to recall websites where their blog ads are displayed. Roger Schlesinger has been advertsiing on my radio program for five years, and he will gladly tell you that those ads, while substantially less than 50% of his advertising budget have brought in more than 50% of his business. Now he has added a web site, wwww.mortgageminuteguy.com to the radio copy which brings people directly to his site, and that info is also part of his blog ad which you see opposite of this text in the blog-ad column. Business is booming. Expect more radio hosts to try and run blogs with blog ads so that they can increase the value to their advertisers seeking to turn scattered impressions into lock solid front-of-mind awareness.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 2:17 AM

Disney is said to be fretting about the opening for "The Great Raid." I think they should calm down. The only movie I heard about while abroad was The Great Raid, and yesterday I heard its praises sung by a very discriminating film-goer. I'll see it this weekend, and I expect tens of millions more will as well.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 2:01 AM

The Times of London reports of the spread from the east of of Russia towards its west end of the Avian bird flu. No human deaths have been connected to the virus in Russia, but if you are saying "So what, I don't each chicken anyway," you will want to read --very slowly, with a pen-- then go immediately to Laurie Garrett's "The Next Pandemic," from the new special issue of Foreign Affairs. The magazine generously made much of the crucial information available free of charge. Key excerpts from the Garrett piece mentioned (she has another in the package):




Scientists have long forecast the appearance of an influenza virus capable of infecting 40 percent of the world's human population and killing unimaginable numbers. Recently, a new strain, H5N1 avian influenza, has shown all the earmarks of becoming that disease. Until now, it has largely been confined to certain bird species, but that may be changing.

The havoc such a disease could wreak is commonly compared to the devastation of the 1918-19 Spanish flu, which killed 50 million people in 18 months. But avian flu is far more dangerous. It kills 100 percent of the domesticated chickens it infects, and among humans the disease is also lethal: as of May 1, about 109 people were known to have contracted it, and it killed 54 percent (although this statistic does not include any milder cases that may have gone unreported). Since it first appeared in southern China in 1997, the virus has mutated, becoming heartier and deadlier and killing a wider range of species. According to the March 2005 National Academy of Science's Institute of Medicine flu report, the "current ongoing epidemic of H5N1 avian influenza in Asia is unprecedented in its scale, in its spread, and in the economic losses it has caused."

In short, doom may loom.


"[D]oom may loom," is not somtething one expects tolead off the lead article in staid old and usually ponderous Foreign Affairs.

More:

The scarcity of flu vaccine, although a serious problem, is actually of little relevance to most of the world. Even if pharmaceutical companies managed to produce enough effective vaccine in time to save some privileged lives in Europe, North America, Japan, and a few other wealthy nations, more than six billion people in developing countries would go unvaccinated. Stockpiles of Tamiflu and other anti-influenza drugs would also do nothing for those six billion, at least 30 percent of whom -- and possibly half -- would likely get infected in such a pandemic.


And more:


In the event of a modern pandemic, the U.S. Department of Defense, with the lessons of World War I in mind, would undoubtedly insist that U.S. troops in Iraq and Afghanistan be given top access to vaccines and antiflu drugs. About 170,000 U.S. forces are currently stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan, while 200,000 more are permanently based elsewhere overseas. All of them would potentially be in danger: in late March, for example, North Korea conceded it was suffering a large-scale H7N1 outbreak -- taking place within miles of some 41,000 U.S. military forces. It is impossible to predict how such a pandemic influenza would affect U.S. operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, Colombia, or any other place.

Armed forces throughout the world would face similar issues. Most would no doubt pressure their governments for preferential access to vaccine and medications. In addition, more than a quarter of some African armies and police forces are HIV positive, perhaps making them especially vulnerable to influenza's lethal impact. Social instability resulting from troop and police losses there would likely be particularly acute.

Such a devastating disease would clearly have profound implications for international relations and the global economy. With death tolls rising, vaccines and drugs in short supply, and the potential for the virus to spread further, governments would feel obliged to take drastic measures that could inhibit travel, limit worldwide trade, and alienate their neighbors. In fact, the Z+ virus has already demonstrated its disruptive potential on a limited scale. In July 2004, for example, when the Z+ strain reemerged in Vietnam after a three-month hiatus, officials in the northern province of Bac Giang charged that Chinese smugglers were selling old and sickly birds in Vietnamese markets -- where more than ten tons of chickens are smuggled daily. Chinese authorities in charge of policing their side of the porous border, more than 1,000 kilometers long, countered that it was impossible to inspect all the shipments. Such conflicts are now limited to the movement of livestock, but if a pandemic develops they could well escalate to a ban on trade and human movement.


Read the whole thing. And then the other articles.


 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 1:56 AM

Thanks to the scores of would-be web-masters who offered to do the grunt work of making the post-makeover corrections to the software. Turns out that my pal Joshua Sharf of View From a Height is in the business, so I will be handing the backroom fixes to him. If he is an abject failure, I will return to the hunt again. Please send to Hugh@HughHewitt.com any of the glitches you have been experience, and I will pass them on the JS.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 1:55 AM


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 1:34 AM

One advantage of jet-lag is reading the morning papers at 1:45 AM, Pacific time. The Washington Post runs a story that concedes that Roberts will be easily confirmed absent some shocker that no one is predicting:


In a series of interviews in recent days, more than a dozen Democratic senators and aides who are intimately involved in deliberations about strategy said that they see no evidence that most Democratic senators are prepared to expend political capital in what is widely seen as a futile effort to derail the nomination.

Although Roberts will bring real change to the Court's decisions --in 5 to 4 decisions where Chief Justice Rehnquist was in the minority and Justice O'Connnor in the majority I would expect a different result in similar cases, though it is impossible to predict-- the Democrats and their pressure groups may have figured out that attacks on superbly qualified nominees of great character and obvious class will hurt their own reputations a great deal and that of the nominee not a bit. So despite danger to precedents such as the University of Michigan affirmative action cases, the Ten Commandments cases, and of course the 5-4 decision striking down the Congress's law banning partial birth abortion, the Senate Democrats will make much noice, but very little heat, and the only light that is thrown will be of the sort that illumines their own far left politics on these and other issues.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 5:58 PM

When would they crack? Fraters asks the question about me. Radioblogger has a more comprehensive survey.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 5:33 PM

This is a revealing story: Massachusetts suspends its sales tax for a weekend, and the retailers experience the greatest sales weekend of the year --with the Christmas season weekends included.


There are many lessons in this bit of news. The first is, obviously, that people respond to pricing, and do so instantly. The second is that sales taxes are particularly of interest to consumers, and that governments would be well served to think supply-side with regards to sales tax levels.


There is also a potential downside: Given that Massachusetts has done this two years in a row, wouldn't the average consumer contemplating a major purchase simply put it off until such time as the next amnesty rolls around? Though cars and items greater than $2,500 are exempt from the program --which must make the car dealers wonder why they are second class citizens on retail row-- saving up to $125 on a fridge and a dryer etc is an incentive to be a patient consumer.