Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 8:19 AM


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 8:05 AM

One Day Run seeks to turn Leap Day into a virtual run around the world.

Go walk or run some miles, then log on to http://onedayrun.com and register the miles and send along a dollar a mile to Ronald McDonald house.

Great idea and a great cause, courtesy of @peterdamico. 
 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 11:24 PM



My assessment of Tuesday's results are over at NationalReview.com's symposium on the subject
. Short version: Mitt Romney will be the GOP nominee.

And a very strong one, going right at the president's many weaknesses and especially his awful incompetence on the economy and his appeasement abroad.

Expect the small donors to continue to get on board at MittRomney.com and for the super pac funders to redouble their efforts and their contributions.  The general election campaign is underway, and there won't be any pause at all on either side.

.
 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 8:02 PM

Be sure to read Article VI Blog's John Schroeder's take on today's faith-baiting by assorted lefties.

The New Yorker's George Packer (see two posts below) actually invokes Article VI in his drive-by of Rick Santorum, which should at least incline him to read his critics at the blog named for the provision of the Constitution he, wrongfully, purports to invoke in condemning Rick Santorum.


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 7:22 PM


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 4:15 PM

 


Monty Python's Spanish inquisition
(Bill Keller, George Packer and Charles Blow)


First, reread this legendarily stupid column by former New York Times editor-in-chief Bill Keller from August 26 of last year.
  In it, Bill Keller demands that the GOP candidates be quizzed about religion, that we "get over our scruples" about asking candidates about the particulars of their religious beliefs.  Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition, especially not in Manhattan's tonier districts, and Keller was much and rightly mocked for his Lefty Boy''s Big Book Of Incendiary Questions.

After you have reread his piece, listen to Keller this morning asserting that Santorum, who has been talking about freedom of religion, wants to impose a sort of Christian Sharia on the country.  Santorum has been responding to questions about religion in the public square and getting zapped for it, but given Keller's August piece, you think he might have had the decency to point out that he and others on the Left had been demanding such conversations on such subjects for months.  Now that Senator Santorum has had some, Keller quite duplicitously condemns Santorum as a Wahhabist for doing so.

Then read the New Yorker's George Packer as he displays a marvelous ignorance of not only the First Amendment's design and interpretation --he seems to have wholly missed the Establishment and Free Exercise clauses and to confuse them with the phrase "Separation of Church and State"-- but he also seems ignorant of the fact that Mr. Keller and many on the left want all the presidential candidates on the right to face some sort of lefty Board of Inquiry on the articles of their religion. Mr. Packer no doubt spent a half hour on Wikipedia this morning coming up with his Madison and Jefferson references, but he might have been better served by reading the 9-0 opinion issued by the Supreme Court in Hosanna Tabor authored by Chief Justice Roberts earlier this year. 

Rick Santorum has been making an argument about (1) the president's attack on the Roman Catholic Church which violates the Free Exercise clause much as did the EEOC's ruling at issue in Hosanna Tabor and (2) the proper role of religious faith in the public square, which is robust and enduring, and which is under assault by the secular absolutists that dominate elite media.

To advance their cause, and thus the re-election chances of the president they love, Mr. Keller and Mr. Packer are quite willing to throw overboard all elementary understanding of what freedom of religion means and to distort not just Santorum's arguments and ignore their own, but also to stoke the fires of religious bigotry as a means to those ends.  A kind of Christian Sharia law?  That is akin to accusing Mr. Keller of the sort of crimes against people that would slanderous per se. 
 
(Mr. Keller and Mr. Packer are not alone in their contributions to stoking the fires of religious bigotry, but the sad Charles Blow, also of the New York Times, is like the weak hitting shortstop of the team who bats ninth and is staring at a demotion to Triple A unless he picks up his game.  Thus Mr. Blow has made yet another contribution to his very long list of inanities this very morning, adding to his established reputation for bigotry and wild intemperance on tweet feed and blog the additional credential of bigotry on television by calling Santorum "crazy."  Blow has the makings of a classic five-tool hater if we can only get him on the radio and the big screen. No doubt he is really hoping that Mr. Keller or Mr. Packer, the Ruth and Gehrig of religious intolerance, notice him and ask him along for a drink.)

Here's the problem.  The Left really doesn't know what it wants except to hate people of faith who refer to that faith as the wellspring of their values.  The vast mob of Manhattan-Beltway media elites gathering to kill the beast that is Rick Santorum, the affable father of seven and devout old-school liberal on matters of faith, is something to behold.  He really does, as Mr. Blow put it, "scare the hell" out of them.  Or perhaps just makes them aware of an argument they'd rather just as soon forget about the centrality of faith to the republic's history and good functioning, along with their certainty that the Soviet Union would never crumble and that President Obama could get the economy moving again.

I open the show with Senator Santorum today and we will talk about Keller and Packer, though not Mr. Blow. Mr. Blow doesn't warrant a response because he has almost no audience.  The other two, unfortunately for the cause of religious tolerance, do.  The transcript of my interview will be posted here later:

The Santorum transcript:



HH: I begin today’s broadcast with former United States Senator Rick Santorum, www.ricksantorum.com. Senator, how are you feeling about Michigan and Arizona today?

RS: You know, we feel great. We’ve worked really hard here in Michigan, and we’re going to continue to scrap to the very end. And we feel like we’ve got some momentum on our side. Obviously, it’s a tough state. I mean, it’s Governor Romney’s home state. He’s got a lot of tradition on his side, and a lot of money on his side here, too, and the establishment Republican organization. But you know, we’ve got, we’re an insurgent campaign, we’ve been it from the very beginning, and we feel like we’ve got a lot of momentum going into these last few hours of the campaign. 

HH: Of course, a week from now, you’re going to my home state of Ohio. Can we get you to pander a little bit and say maybe Go Browns, beat the Steelers, or anything like that?

RS: You know what? Over my dead body.

HH: (laughing)

RS: That’s one of the things I will absolutely draw the line on.

 Read More...

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 1:11 PM


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 10:47 AM

My friend Bill Blankschaen lives in Chardon and is principal of a private Christian school nearby.  Read his post this morning and really think through whether or not he is right.  I think he obviously is and have said so on air for years.

.
 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 10:37 AM

The weekly column from Clark Judge:

How the GOP Will Win… or Lose
By Clark S. Judge: managing director of the White House Writers Group, Inc.; chairman, Pacific Research Institute
 
As two more states hold Republican primaries today, the message out of national data is that the election is the GOP’s to lose – and the party may prove fully up to the task.
 
Yes, I have heard talk about the president’s approval ratings surging.  But look at the Rasmussen tracking graph (http://tinyurl.com/5tnd2b).  If the president’s approval rating were a stock, no one would claim we are coming out of the recession.  Rather, Obama, Inc. fell from amazing heights right after its 2008 IPO to depressed levels within a year, established a trading range and has stayed within that range ever since.  The top of the range is about 50 percent, the bottom about forty. The stock has become a little more volatile over the last seven months.  It has moved from the top to the bottom to the top.  Not much time has been spent in the middle. But it has never escaped the range.
 







 Read More...

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 9:37 AM


The highest price of gas in Los Angeles is $5.69 a gallon at the Chevron at Olympic and Pico, and the lowest cost gas is at $4.15 at Soto and 4rth.

The Wall Street Journal's Gerald Seib notes that "Iran and its nuclear intentions are rapidly emerging as the ultimate wild card in this year's presidential race."

Home prices declined in the fourth quarter, and "[d]urable goods orders dropped 4.0 percent [in January], the biggest decline since January 2009 when the country was still mired in a deep recession, according to Commerce Department data on Tuesday."

So Obama apologists out and about touting yet another "summer, er, winter of recovery," and downplaying the GOP's likelihood of tossing out the president in November, you just keep on whistling. The map is the map and the serious players know it comes down to a dozen states, two of which are voting today.

Mitt Romney is going to win Arizona and if he wins in Michigan despite the efforts of Democrats to push Rick Santorum over the top, he will still have won in the big three primaries of early 2012 in the states that matter the most to the GOP in the fall: New Hampshire, Florida and Arizona.  A Michigan win by Rick Santorum gives him another hand to play in Ohio next week, but if Romney does win in Michigan that effectively seals the deal and the GOP base will get behind the effort to oust the man savaging the economy and world security on a nearly daily basis.

An Obama-Romney race will be about making a fundamental choice, and despite the angst that intense primary campaigns generate, it will take only a couple of weeks to see the GOP coalesce and the independents begin to move towards a center-right coalition.

Read Sean Trende's book
or my chat with Karl Rove yesterday.  The GOP is in very good shape though the brawling has left its two leading contenders bruised and bloodied.  They are both in better shape for all the traded punches, lots of lessons have been learned --think Romney's advance team is better prepared for the fall now than it was last week, or that the public isn't already clued into the Chicago gang's "contraception" cynicism?-- and the support will quickly go from steady to overwhelming as the country realizes it really cannot afford a second term of this incoherent, highly ideological and apparently stubborn and isolated pseudo-intellectual at 1600.

I will do an additional two hours of election night coverage this evening to bring the results of the two primaries along with the expert analysis from our usual team of political reporters and pundits.

The best news of all?  No more MSM-warped debates.    The GOP has made it to the heart of the primary schedule and is finally free of the anchors of the anchors trying to defend the president at every turn by turning every question away from his abysmal and ruinous record. 

.