x close

The Hugh Hewitt Show

Listen 24/7 Live: Mon - Fri   6 - 9 PM Eastern
Call the Show 800-520-1234

Bill Kristol On Causation: Why Was It Wrong For Clinton To Attack Rush Limbaugh After Oklahoma City, But Right To Blast DiBlasio After The Assassination of Two NYPD Officers

Monday, December 22, 2014  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

Most everyone on the right and many in the middle and a few on the left correctly condemned Bill Clinton’s attack on Rush Limbaugh in the aftermath of the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, but now many who condemned Clinton then are pointing fingers at MSNBC’s Al Sharpton, New York City Mayor Bill DiBlasio and even President Obama for fueling a climate of anti-police hatred that has encouraged violence directed at the men and women in blue.  Is it possible to be both condemning of Clinton for making a false linkage in 1995 and then, nearly two decades later, make the same sort of linkage in a different setting?

The answer of course is yes, because the issue is causation.  Not all allegations of tortious conduct end up with verdicts against the accused, but many do.  It depends on the sequence familiar to any first year law student:  liability for torts depends upon a showing of proof of duty, breach,  injury, causation –actual (“but-for”) and proximate (“legal”)– and damages.  Many claims of liability for injuries suffered fail on the causation prong of the proof sequence –the links are too tenuous.

That was the case in 1995 –there was zero link between Rush’s programming and Timothy McVeigh. Today’s critiques of Sharpton et al for the deaths of NYPD officers Ramos and Liu rest on the persuasiveness of the argument that they contributed to the killer’s murderous actions, and are not more or less persuasive because Clinton launched a terribly unjust attack two decades ago.

To be clear: Everyone has to make their own judgment, but that Bill Clinton made a terrible argument in 1995 shouldn’t foreclose an inquiry into cause and effect in 2014, a subject I discussed with Weekly Standard editor Bill Kristol today:

Audio:

12-22hhs-kristol

Transcript:

HH: I’m joined now by the editor of the Weekly Standard, Bill Kristol. Hello, Bill, thank you for joining me at these holiday times.

BK: Happy to be with you, Hugh, happy holidays.

HH: Thank you, and to you. Now the story of the hour is Mayor de Blasio today who both gave a speech and a press conference. In the latter, he blamed the media for creating the climate. Charles Krauthammer said earlier on this show in the first hour the President should be embarrassed by Sharpton. He also said that Sharpton had imposed on Ferguson and Staten Island the issue of race. And questions today are being raised about culpability. What do you make about the general argument about the assassination of Officer Ramos and Liu being linked to anyone other than the killer?

BK: Look, the killer’s responsible, and I think you and I have argued this for years. You take one event, a country of 320 million people, and you all of a sudden want to start blaming broader social trends or forces. On the other hand, the killer did say that it was revenge for the, I guess, for these two incidents. And these two incidents have been distorted and hyped pretty consciously by people in the media like Al Sharpton, and unfortunately by political leaders like de Blasio. I mean, I said this on Morning Joe. I was in New York. I was really struck, incidentally, how much people in New York, how upset they are, and these are, you know, the cameramen and the cab drivers. And I don’t know what their politics are. But I mean, they are with the cops, and they are not happy that their own mayor has felt that this was a good chance to give lectures about three centuries of racism and about what he tells his son in private about dealing with cops. And you know, the guy was grandstanding. The guy was using it as an opportunity to make political points. And now, something terrible happens, maybe somewhat related to what he did, and now it’s all hey, these radical protesters, I had nothing to do with them. It was all peaceful protesters. I was on the train back to D.C. during the press conference, and I just read some of the transcript. What were these peaceful protesters, according to de Blasio, protesting? I mean, he’s the mayor of the city. Was it the Democratic governor? Was it President Obama, the president of the United States? Eric Holder’s the attorney general. If they want policy changes, they should pick up the phone and get their, get the people who they voted for to put through those policy changes. The Republican Congress isn’t blocking anything they want to do. You know what I mean? So when they endorse this kind of protest, it’s the sort of 60s protest against the society. That’s what they’re doing. There’s no practical public policy issue here. Continue Reading

AdvertisementAdvertise With Us

Krauthammer On President’s Friendship With Al Sharpton: “That’s A Disgrace”

Monday, December 22, 2014  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

Dr. Charles Krauthammer, author of the best-selling non-fiction book of 2014, Things That Matter, opened the program today with a review of the events in New York and of the charges and counter-charges flying about:

Audio:

12-22hhs-krauthammer

Transcript:

HH: On the day Joe Cocker dies, Joe Cocker is, well, a legend. And I’m curious whether my first guest, Dr. Charles Krauthammer, was actually at Woodstock. Hello, Charles, how are you?

CK: No, I wasn’t. I wish I’d been, and I love Joe Cocker.

HH: He’s an amazing character.

CK: He was great, and I just, I mean, when he sang, he made the rafters shake. He was amazing.

HH: It’s interesting to be talking about him today, because I’m about to play for you a clip of William Bratton, the New York City Police Commissioner, where he was talking about the 70s. And of course, that’s the decade of Joe Cocker. It’s the decade of abandonment of all. And you talk a little bit about that in Things That Matter. But what were you primarily doing in those years, Charles? You were injured in those years as you write about in the book, but did you begin them in Canada?

CK: No, I began them in England. I was studying at Oxford. I was a graduate student there. And then I went to medical school in 1971. So my 70s were spent, the 1970s for me, were in medicine, four years as a medical student, then three years as a resident, and then chief resident at the Mass General Hospital. So that was my 20s, and that’s where the 1970s, and it was in a wholly different world. Continue Reading

“And They’re Off”

Sunday, December 21, 2014  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

 

My Monday Washington Examiner column is on the quick start on 2016 called by Jeb Bush.

Another potential contender, Senator Marco Rubio, used Meet The Press to slam President Obama’s Cuba move and his overall foreign policy.  Sounding more like a presidential candidate than a Senate candidate, though of course a Senate candidate from Florida loves to argue this case on the most prestigious of the Sunday shows.

In this Nov. 20, 2014, file photo, former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush gives the keynote address at the National Summit on Education Reform in Washington. On Tuesday, Dec. 16, 2014, Bush took his most definitive step yet toward running for president, announcing plans to "actively explore" a campaign and form a new political operation allowing him to raise money for like-minded Republicans. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)

“Tame By Christie’s Volcanic Standards”

Sunday, December 21, 2014  |  posted by Hugh Hewitt

 

 

 

This David Farenhold piece in the Washington Post is clearly an early entry in the “define the candidates” sweepstakes getting underway as the race to succeed President Obama gets underway, and it makes no mention whatsoever of the screened-off insularity of electeds like the president which is a much more objectionable problem in a democratic republic than a governor who engages often with voters and lets his feelings show when actually answering unscripted questions from the public. Farenhold counts “at least 14 raised-voice confrontations with regular people” over the 5-plus years of Christie’s tenure as governor, which includes “127 town-hall meetings across the state,” and who knows how many political events open to a curious public and provocateurs alike like the event with Meg Whitman recounted in the story.

“Trackers” are ubiquitous, recording every moment of every public figure so if there are other Christie “confrontations,” Farenhold would know about them, just as he knows about the Whitman event.   As ubiquitous as trackers are “narratives,” and “volcanic” is a narrative MSM has already tattooed on the New Jersey governor just as “no drama” got attached to the president when “detached, disinterested, clueless and out-of-touch” could have easily served with the president and “passionate and engaged with an occasional direct, even head-on confrontational style” would work with Christie.

The MSM loves its power to shape campaigns past and present. 2016 is underway and so is the caging of Christie behind the bars marked “volcanic and confrontational.” Every other GOPer will get short-handed in some way shape or form. Mrs. Clinton? Look for “steady,” “experienced,” “unflappable if somewhat predictable, even dull” instead of “isolated, thin-skinned and glass-jawed.”  Nothing to be done about it except developing an eye for the editorial comment wrapped inside of a description.

Page 1 of 32781 2 3 4 3,278
Advertisement
Advertisement
Invite Hugh to Speak
Advertisement
Advertisement
Back to Top
Unbroken Movie